![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Arkansas Weekly Case Summaries |
Beginning September 14, 2005, The Arkansas Bar Association has been posting summaries of Arkansas Supreme Court and Appellate Court decisions. These summaries are freely available on their website. Opinions are organized by the main subject of the opinion. Docket numbers are provided, but no link to the full decisions. Full opinions can be found at the Arkansas Judiciary opinions page by date or party name. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Competitive Intelligence: The Latest Buzz Word or a Permanent Change in Legal Marketing? 4/18/05 | |||
|
Competitive Intelligence is the use of information on your competitors obtained through raw data to analyze their actions in the marketplace. This is all done legally, the providers of these services hasten to add. The practice is not so new to certain businesses. For example, a chain store looking to expand will examine real estate transaction records nationwide to find out where and how their competitors are expanding. Competitive Intelligence is just starting to be talked about in the legal sector. No doubt the tremendous volume of publicly available records related to the practice of law has made the idea attractive to the consultants who offer their services. Recently National Law Journal published an article covering the recent introduction of the idea. Since two popular legal research and technology blogs on the daily Wherelaw reading list, TVC Alert and Technolawyer picked up on this, your intrepid author quickly spotted the trend. Then LexisNexis comes out with a pre-packaged product: LexisNexis Market Intelligence. Of course the practice has existed long before there was a catchy phrase, and a consultant's pitch to sell it. Most Mid-South lawyers regularly glanced at the lists of court filings in the Daily News to see who's doing what or not doing what. The legal profession has become sufficiently DIY that any lawyer who researches online can imagine how this process works even if he has never done it. Now that the idea is evolving in to it's own area, it bears thinking about how much data you can use and how much data you yourself generate that can be used to deduce what your practice is doing. Plus now you'll want to include the term on your buzzword bingo card. |
|||
|
Private Information Data Theft Just Beginning to Affect Law Practice
3/15/05 First of all, access by researchers to consumer/personal data is already being affected and will likely continue. Another aspect is Congressional interest in the data provider industry with an eye to implementing new regulations. And lastly, in the author's opinion, chances are high that liability will ensue for companies whose data bases of personal information have been accessed by identity thieves for any resulting losses. This last point affects not only the information providers, but potentially any retail operation or other business that keeps records of customers and clients. TVC
first reported last week, and was later
confirmed that access to LexisNexis's public records database has been
restricted from access by pay-as-you-go users, or those using credit cards
and
LexisNexis AlaCarte. These restrictions are apparently temporary,
but a permanent change that requires verification of users is likely.
LexisNexis
privacy policy was revised again last week. This will impact small
and infrequent users who rely on LexisNeixs to make quick work of public
record searches. One alternative is to use the free directory of public
records sites,
Portico. While it is free as are many of the official public
records site to which it links, it takes more time, and the content is not
100% stable but dependant on the upkeep of government agencies and trade
associations that actually provide these databases. In an earlier
post on Westlaw and Senator Schumer, Westlaw explained
it's policies and already have in place a much stricter verification process
than other providers before allowing access to consumer information. The area of data sharing is already regulated under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB), but most of the protections afforded require the consumer to know the law and be proactive in protecting their credit information. An guide to using these right can be found at the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. By using the opt-out option under GLB and the 90 day Fraud Alert option provided by the three major credit reporting companies, consumers can temporarily freeze their credit, albeit they have to know what to do and spend the time and effort getting it done in time to prevent damage. Also see the FTC's guide to recovery from ID theft. Some lawmakers will likely conclude, as Bruce Schneier does, that new regulations on data security ought to permit civil penalties to data providers who fail to secure data or adequately verify customers who access data. By comparison the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 2721 - 2125, protects information contained in state motor vehicle records from unauthorized access. Persons responsible for unauthorized disclosure, including negligent state employee actions, can incur severe civil penalties. See 183 A.L.R. Fed. 37. Already suits have been filed against ChoicePoint under existing theories of liability. Up until now, the primary sources of ID thieves had focused on stolen receipts, intercepted mail, email fraud or unsecured internet connections. Last week's Congressional hearing were only the first of several hearings focusing on the the data brokers role in ID theft leading to more and more media attention to these companies. The emerging fear in this issue is the lack of control consumers have on their information held by data brokers when those brokers cannot secure that data. And data brokers are just the first to be examined for breaches of security. Last week retailer DSW Shoe Warehouse revealed that customer credit card information in their system had been hacked. Except for California, no state requires consumer notification when their information has been stolen. Should that change, victims of ID theft will, in some cases, know the source where the thieves acquired their personal information. All of this paves the way for potential liability to even the smaller retailers or any business holding consumer data. Now would be the time to reassess your business client's systems for securing that data. Further fueling this shift in ID theft targets is the growing sophistication of thieves. ChoicePoint was not hacked in the conventional sense, but deceived by thieves posing as legitimate business customers using, what else, stolen identities. Since ID theft is the largest growing crime in the U.S. the potential for loss could increase exponentially. Lawyers will have to anticipate where they will be able to access the public records with personal data that they need, how the law will change to protect data, and how to advise their clients on protecting their own data or the data of others they hold. -toof
|
|||
|
New Code Sections Effective January 1st, 2005 These are the primary code sections affected. Not included are smaller changes such as the amendments to referring chapters that go along with a major revision. The chapter numbers are linked to the Secretary of State's version and code sections will be linked once the free Lexis T.C.A. has been updated. The Legislature's site now has an official list in .pdf format listed by chapter number. This change preceded LexisNexis own revelation that Sections Amended/Added Chapter Title of Act
36-5-101(a)(6)
906 CHILDREN AND MINORS--CHILD SUPPORT--
40-11-150, 40-15-105
780
SOCIAL SERVICES--HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS-- 40-39-111 777 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE--SEXUAL OFFENDERS
43-38-101 to
43-70-101
534
AGRICULTURE--PROCESSING
COOPERATIVE LAW
45 chs. 1, 5 and 13 747
BANKS AND BANKING--MORTGAGE BROKERS AND
49-7-107
879 EDUCATION--COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES--
50-6-101 et seq.
962
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT--WORKERS
56-5-2 to 8
527
INSURANCE--PERSONAL
INSURANCE RATES AND
62-26-225
555
PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS--EDUCATION--
62-32-312
895 PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS--ALARM
67-4-2 - 13
803
TAXATION--LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES--
67-4-2301 et seq.
852
TAXATION--DISABLED VETERANS--TAX
67-4-2701 et seq.
852
TAXATION--DISABLED VETERANS--TAX
67-5-704
852
TAXATION--DISABLED VETERANS--TAX
68-11-254, 1004
780
SOCIAL SERVICES--HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS--
71-6-102, 120
780 SOCIAL SERVICES--HEALTH CARE
PROVIDERS-- Effective March 1, 2005
6 chs.
4,17,18,21,33
914
COURTS--MUNICIPAL COURT REFORM ACT OF
16 chs. 17,18,21
914
COURTS--MUNICIPAL COURT REFORM ACT OF
17 chs. 3 and 5
914
COURTS--MUNICIPAL COURT REFORM ACT OF
55-10-3
914
COURTS--MUNICIPAL COURT REFORM ACT OF
67-4-6
914
COURTS--MUNICIPAL COURT REFORM ACT OF
|
|||
|
Top Ten Underutilized
Tennessee Law Resources
In my experience, only pro se types
readily admit to a librarian they don't know what they are looking for.
Attorneys must see this type of behavior as a sign of weakness.
Typically, they ask for what they know even if it is not exactly what will
do the job and then, as if making small talk, wonder out
loud.
"Why isn't there a good form book on Tennessee trust provisions"
they'll say.
1.
West's Tennessee
Code Annotated
2.
Tennessee Circuit
Court Practice
by Lawrence Pivnick
3. Tennessee Supreme and Appellate Court
Opinions online for free at
www.tsc.state.tn.us/geninfo/courts/AppellateCourts.htm
4. Tennessee Rules and Regulations online at
www.state.tn.us/sos/rules/index.htm
5. Tennessee
Legal & Business
Forms, Vol.
4 Estate Planning
by Thomas M. Leveille
6. Tennessee
Practice Vols.
5 and 6
Civil Procedure
Forms, 3d ed. by Nancy
Fraas McLean and Matthew Jeffery McLean
7.
www.firstgov.com
8.
Appellate
Advocacy: a Handbook
on Appellate Practice
in Tennessee, 3d
ed.
Donald Capparella, Editor
9.
University of Memphis Law School Library Catalog Online
10.
www.google.com -toof brown / link / print / |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Disclaimer: This site is hosted and maintained by Toof Brown, III who
is solely responsible for its content. All Information on this site
is intended for use by legal professionals and is not legal
advice. The application of laws and opinions expressed on this site will
necessarily not be the same when applied to differing specific facts of
individual cases. If you want to know how the law will apply to your
case, consultation with a licensed attorney is the only advice I will
recommend.
| |||